NBC may have known they already had the equivalent of “Days” NBC viewers watching the show for free on Peacock, so they just had to convince built-in streaming audience to pay, and even if some didn’t, they could successfully move some of the live NBC audience behind the pay wall. And that “Days,” well, didn’t lose audience apparently. That leads me to believe she really does have the insider’s information. A Variety article that essentially supports the core fact she advanced before anyone else ( that Peacock was successful in Q3).
#Passions soap opera nbc peacock streaming full
So, I mean… We saw a Variety article publish a full day after she posted her tweets on what she said an NBC Universal contact told her in a phone conversation. It is in the top 10 when ALL programming is counted.” “And those are Days fans -because I was told that DAYS is averaging 1.5 million hits /per day/ -making it the #1 program among Peacock’s DAILY shows. That said, here’s what Kola Boof said about the new Variety article reporting on Peacock’s major Q3 gains: Unless Peacock breaks tradition and spills the beans. So, we’re not going to hear (officially) “Days” numbers.
In fact, in one article I read about the viewership for the “Law and Order” crossover, Peacock would only say the numbers were HUGE and quantified that in terms of (can’t remember the exact number but) a multiplier like “six times what they were last year, when the show’s next-day episodes streamed on Hulu.” Then, I label it clearly as a rumor and say, essentially, what I did here.īasically, here’s what this person is saying, here’s why I think it rings true, and here’s outside evidence that would support this assertion.Īnyway, streamers famously don’t tell viewership numbers. That’s why, before I even think of sharing a rumor, I question the source and if their story rings true (based on connections, or the account’s assertions). Yet, they still should be known (unofficially, on message boards like this one). However, some things are factual but never reported in a reputable publication. So, we’ve found common ground on this one point.
0 kommentar(er)
